Improve work inside your firm, lead an implementation with a portfolio company, or help several teams build their AI capability.
They don’t have to come in order. A fund can start internally, a company can come to us directly, or an operating partner can begin with one company.
Work inside the fund itself.
We improve the workflow and its review. We don’t make investment decisions or underwrite deals.
One company, one recurring problem.
The company needs its own sponsor, access and agreed scope. An introduction isn’t a commitment to take part.
Several companies, coordinated by the fund.
Each company keeps its own priorities, data permissions and owner. Nothing is pooled.
Examples of recurring work in a firm or its companies. Each is scoped to the company that owns it.
The work to improve, the owner and a baseline to measure against.
A useful, bounded change, tested on real work.
In the company’s own tools, with the people who run it.
Who owns it, how progress is reviewed, and how further work is approved.
Both. The firm can buy work for itself, sponsor work in a company, or coordinate several. Each engagement has its own scope and owner.
We don’t make investment decisions or underwrite deals. Inside the firm, we improve the work around them: finding what the firm already knows across documents and past deals, and preparing research and meeting briefs, with sources.
Access is part of each engagement’s agreed scope. Each company keeps its own data permissions and owner, and nothing is pooled across portfolio companies.
No. An introduction isn’t a commitment to take part. A company that does take part needs its own sponsor, access and agreed scope.
The work is scoped to the company that owns it. Setting ownership is part of how it starts: who owns it, how progress is reviewed, and how further work is approved.
Tell us about the firm, a company or the portfolio. We’ll suggest a sensible place to start.
